The “Sutherland Report” was a study conducted by the DEC
which was chosen by the City Council and was compiled between 1986 and1987
regarding the condition of Loughberry Lake and its water shed which has been
the principal water source for Saratoga Springs since 1870. If you haven’t noticed, Saratoga
Springs has changed quite a bit since then both in
population, building growth and pollution.
As James Sutherland, who was the research scientist for the DEC and was
the person who issued the report, hence “the Sutherland Report” stated, “an
important study finding was that only 4% of the Loughberry Lake watershed lies
within the City of Saratoga Springs; the remaining portion of the watershed is
in Greenfield (33%) and Wilton (63%).
This means that the city of Saratoga Springs
has no control over the land-use activities in the watershed that cause steady
degradation of the lake’s water quality.
This fact alone should be cause for alarm and action.” As Sutherland also stated “Loughberry
Lake was classified as “moderately
contaminated” with heavy metals.
Nuisance aquatic vegetation was a major concern to the extent that weed
harvesting was initiated and continues even today. The presence of Route 50, a major traffic
thoroughfare along the lake’s southern shoreline, is always cause for concern
(also accidents like the City spilling fuel in the lake not too long ago) is
always cause for concern since shutdown of the city’s primary water supply is
only one traffic accident away from being a reality, which would paralyze city
water users.
In retrospect, the 10
year lead time suggested in the report before replacement of Loughberry
Lake became imperative was
unrealistic. However, the purpose of
that number was to encourage the City Council to start planning the replacement
of the lake as its primary source of drinking water within a reasonable time
period.
As Mr. Sutherland also stated “Recently, I have noticed
occasional articles in the Saratogian about the Loughberry
Lake water supply and the Bog
Meadow Brook system and realize that not too much has changed since the “Sutherland
Report” was released 26 years ago.” (One
thing has changed though; our current Commissioner has made back room deals to
sell our precious drinking water to developments outside the City of Saratoga
Springs ).
We are very fortunate to have a gentleman like Mr.
Sutherland along with his experience as a neighbor and he should be a welcome
source of information to the City. I
only wish past Council’s would have taken his report seriously and acted on it.
I have followed the need of those who wanted to swap the
land on Broadway for a parcel on Union Avenue to construct an Eastside
Firehouse and EMS facility for residents on
the East side of the Northway. The deal
passed unanimously at the last Council meeting.
East side voices were heard for months at past Council meetings, “residents
expressed urgent concern for the project, asking the City to act in their best
interest.” Laurie Wellman, who lives
near Saratoga Lake ,
expressed concern for the desperate need for emergency services in her
neighborhood. How about this one, “How
much is just one life worth?” or How long do we have to wait? This is a good one, ‘We are residents of the
City, we pay taxes to the City and we hope that our lives and property are
valued by the City’.
I’m linking the 2 stories for you, especially the Lake
people to think about. Those who yelled
and pleaded with the City and those homeowner group reps on or near the lake
demanding the firehouse and EMS facility,
which I believe are needed, are the same people who cry and yell whenever
Saratoga Lake is mentioned as a water source for the City and all of its residents. The anti lake people are led by General Wilma
Koss’s militia and they could care less about the state of our drinking
water. Loughberry Lake was found to be
moderately productive and contaminated 27 years ago, yet it is still in use
today with no back up plan in sight and I ask the East side residents “How much
is one life worth?”, How long do we have to wait for a back up plan? We are residents of the City; we pay City
taxes and hope that our lives and property are valued by the City. We are expressing urgent concern for a water
project and the lake is the best one and we are asking the City Council to act
in our best interest. Let’s hope those
out near the lake will be a little more rational when the Lake
comes up again in conversation as a water supply, which will happen sooner than
later.